FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
DATO SERI ANWAR IBRAHIM – Appellant
Versus
PP & ANOTHER APPEAL – Respondent
[1] In this judgment, Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim will be referred to as "the first appellant" and Sukma Darmawan Sasmitaat Madja will be referred to as "the second appellant".
[2] The first appellant was charged with an offence punishable under s 377B of the Penal Code.
[3] The second appellant was charged with two offences. The first charge is for abetting the first appellant in the commission of the offence with which the first appellant was charged. The second charge is similar to the charge against the first appellant ie, under s 377B of the Penal Code.
[4] Both the appellants were tried jointly. The first appellant was convicted and sentenced to nine years imprisonment commencing from the expiry of the sentence he was then serving in the first trial (High Court Kuala Lumpur Criminal Trial No: 45-48-1998 [1999] 1 MLRH 59, [1999] 2 MLJ 1 (HC), [2000] 1 MLRA 151; [2000] 2 MLJ 486; [2000] 2 CLJ 695; [2000] 2 AMR 1938 (CA) and [2002] 1 MLRA 266; [2002] 3 MLJ 193; [2002] 3 CLJ 457). The second appellant was convicted on both charges and sentenced to six years imprisonment and two strokes for each charge with the sentences of imprisonment to run concurrent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.