COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
PACIFIC INTER-LINK SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
EPA MANAGEMENT SDN BHD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court concludes in favor of appellant, asserting jurisdictional issues require arbitration. (Para 1) |
| 2. parties have longstanding business relationships regarding crude palm oil sales. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 3. contentions arise regarding definitions and terms of payment liabilities. (Para 5 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court observes ambiguity in contractual interpretations around late payment interest. (Para 6 , 12) |
| 5. determination of dispute necessary before addressing merits alongside jurisdictional rights. (Para 7 , 9 , 13 , 18) |
[1] The issue in this appeal is whether there is a dispute between the parties that ought to be referred to arbitration before the respondent could commence the civil action against the appellant at the High Court. The High Court allowed the respondent's (plaintiff below) claim. On appeal to us by the appellant (defendant below), we allowed the appeal and set aside the High Court order with costs. These are our reasons for doing so.
[2] The appellant is a trading company that purchases and sells crude palm oil (CPO) to its clients. The respondent is a company that supplies and sells Malaysian crude palm oil. The appellant and respon
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.