SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 3192 ; 2011 MarsdenLR 1

ROSLAN MAT NOR
LEA YUEN POK – Appellant
Versus
DYSON MANUFACTURING SDN BHD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual basis for application. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. consequences of proceeding with overlapping cases. (Para 4 , 7)
3. court's authority to stay proceedings. (Para 5 , 6)
4. interpretation of statutory provisions. (Para 8 , 9)
5. implied jurisdiction and its applicability. (Para 10 , 11)
6. distinction of issues in separate courts. (Para 12 , 13)
7. overlapping jurisdictions do not constitute duplicity. (Para 14 , 15)
AWARD INTERIM

1. Pihak Responden telah memohon kepada Mahkamah ini supaya diberikan suatu perintah agar kes ini digantung atau ditangguhkan pendengarannya sehingga penyelesaian kes Guaman Sivil no. MT3-23-3-2009 di Mahkamah Tinggi Malaya di Johor Bahru. Alasan permohonan Pihak Responden dapat dilihat di dalam notis permohonan yang diperturunkan dalam bahasa asalnya seperti berikut:

"The grounds in supporting this Application are as follows:-

(a) The matter herein and the Civil Suit involves the same issues and facts which includes but is not limited to the facts in relation to the Claimants dismissal as has been pleaded by both parties;

(b) As such, in order to avoid inconsistent finding of facts, it is better to stay and/or postpone and/or adjourn the hear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top