SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 683

COURT OF APPEAL, PUTRAJAYA
TAN BUN TEET & ORS – Appellant
Versus
MENTERI SAINS TEKNOLOGI DAN INOVASI MALAYSIA & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the appeal (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding injunction/stay application (Para 6 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 14)
3. court's observations and legal principles applied (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 15 , 17)
Azahar Mohamed JCA:

[1] This was an appeal by the appellants (the applicants in the High Court) against the decision of the learned judge of the Kuantan High Court given on 8 November 2012 dismissing the appellants' application (encl 13) dated 14 September 2012 for an interim stay until the final disposal of the pending judicial review proceedings.We heard the appeal on 19 December 2012, wherein at its conclusion we unanimously dismissed it with costs. We now give our reasons for so deciding. For convenience, we will refer to the parties in this judgment to the title assigned to them in the Court below.

[2] To make the point under discussion easier to understand, we think it is useful to state briefly the factual background and the sequence of events leading to the present appeal. The applicants are residents of the town of Kuantan, Kg Sungai Ular, Damansara Kuantan Township, and/or are registered proprietors of landed properties in the areas in the Dist

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top