Back
HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
UPTOWN PROPERTIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIR TANAH WILAYAH PERSEKUTUAN & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. title ownership and registration issues (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. examining statutory compliance in land registration (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. validity of transfers and sufficiency of instruments (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17) |
| 4. indefeasibility principles of land title (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24) |
| 5. duties and negligence of public officers (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 6. constitutional protection against deprivation of property (Para 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 7. administrative accountability (Para 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. final orders and remedies granted (Para 40) |
[1] This case involves problems arising out of the computerisation of titles and the nightmare that can arise if things go awry. The matter was disposed of after a full trial and I reserved judgment till the 31st of January 2012 wherein I found for the plaintiff and made the orders that I did.
[2] Let me turn first to the facts of this case. The primary facts of this case remain in the main undisputed. The Land in question was registered in the name of the plaintiff and held under Lot 1599 located at the 3rd Mile, New Petaling Road (Old Klang Road). The issue Document of Title (exhibit P1) is found at p 1 of Bun
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
