[3] In this judgment we will refer to the parties as they were in the High court.

[4] To obtain the policy, a consideration of RM1,295.75 in annual premiums were paid by the plaintiff. The amount insured was RM365,000. The period of coverage was from 31 May 2006 until 30 May 2007, both dates inclusive.

[5] In the early morning of 8 February 2007, a fire broke out in the insured premises, destroying the insured goods and other goods belonging to the plaintiff. The plaintiff estimated its loss to be about RM424.000.

[6] The plaintiff then made a claim against the defendant for the total insured amount of RM365,000 but the claim was rejected by the defendant.

[7] The plaintiff claimed that the fire was caused by a short circuit in the electrical wiring at the premises. However, the defendant said that the fire was caused by the deliberate act of the plaintiff through its agents using kerosene placed at several places in the insured premises.

In The High court

[8] The plaintiff therefore filed this suit before the High court claiming the insured sum of RM365,000 with interest at the rate of 8%pa on the insured sum from the date the cause of action accrued (8 February 2007) until full and fin