SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 2475

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
PENGARAH JABATAN PENGANGKUTAN NEGERI SELANGOR & ORS – Appellant
Versus
SIN YOONG MING – Respondent


Table of Content
1. questions of law posed for appeal. (Para 1 , 2)
2. factual background of the case. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. court's observations on statutory duties. (Para 10)
4. court's analysis of statutory duties. (Para 11 , 13 , 19 , 21)
5. determination of legal principles based on precedents. (Para 12 , 18)
6. arguments presented by the parties. (Para 15 , 16 , 17)
7. ratio decidendi concerning statutory obligations. (Para 22)

[1] Leave was granted on 21 May 2013 to the appellants to appeal against the decision of the Court of Appeal given on 30 July 2012 on the following questions of law (in Malay):

"(1) sama ada kes Ketua Polis Negeri Sembilan & Anor v. Manoharan Dorasamy, [2004] 3 MLJ 565 terpakai kepada kenderaan yang ditukar hakmilik menurut s 13 Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 ; dan (Whether the case of Ketua Polis Negeri Sembilan & Anor v. Manoharan Dorasamy, applies to vehicles whose registration are transferred pursuant to s 13 of the Road Transport Act 1987);

(2) jika jawapan kepada soalan pertama di atas adalah dalam bentuk positif, sama ada gantirugi diperuntukkan di bawah Akta Pengangkutan Jalan 1987 untuk keingkaran kewajipan statutori di bawah s 13 Akta P

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top