FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN SARAWAK HOUSING DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of lawsuit by chairman of association (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 4) |
| 2. fraudulent actions and duties of care (Para 3 , 10 , 12 , 15) |
| 3. capacity to sue and procedural compliance (Para 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. locus standi issue and legal interpretations (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. interpretation of s 9(c) of the act (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 6. representative action in absence of public officer (Para 22 , 23 , 25) |
[1] The defendant, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, had filed a successful leave application before us in respect of the sole question of law which reads as follows:
"Whether the Sarawak Housing Developers' Association, which is a society registered under the Societies Act 1966 , can sue as "Chairman Sarawak Housing Developers' Association."
[2] The plaintiff, ie the respondent had sued the appellant for the refund of RM322,007.95 debited from its account. In the course of the hearing at the High Court, followed by an appeal at the Court of Appeal, much centered on the issue whether the respondent was right in suing the appellant under the office-bearer's capacity of 'Chairman, Sarawak Housing Developers' Association' rather than his individual name. As gleaned from abov
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.