SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 2443

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
MALAYAN BANKING BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
CHAIRMAN SARAWAK HOUSING DEVELOPERS ASSOCIATION – Respondent


Table of Content
1. nature of lawsuit by chairman of association (Para 1 , 1 , 2 , 4)
2. fraudulent actions and duties of care (Para 3 , 10 , 12 , 15)
3. capacity to sue and procedural compliance (Para 11 , 13 , 14)
4. locus standi issue and legal interpretations (Para 16 , 17 , 18)
5. interpretation of s 9(c) of the act (Para 19 , 20 , 21)
6. representative action in absence of public officer (Para 22 , 23 , 25)

[1] The defendant, hereinafter referred to as the appellant, had filed a successful leave application before us in respect of the sole question of law which reads as follows:

"Whether the Sarawak Housing Developers' Association, which is a society registered under the Societies Act 1966 , can sue as "Chairman Sarawak Housing Developers' Association."

[2] The plaintiff, ie the respondent had sued the appellant for the refund of RM322,007.95 debited from its account. In the course of the hearing at the High Court, followed by an appeal at the Court of Appeal, much centered on the issue whether the respondent was right in suing the appellant under the office-bearer's capacity of 'Chairman, Sarawak Housing Developers' Association' rather than his individual name. As gleaned from abov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top