SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 202

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TNB FUEL SERVICES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
CHINA NATIONAL COAL GROUP CORP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. background facts of tender and arbitration. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)

[1] In 2002, the appellant called for tenders for the long term supply of coal for its Tanjung Bin Power Project. The tender documentation provided to the respondent included the proforma Coal Purchase Contract, Bid Form, and Form of Bid Bond.

[2] On or about 4 December 2012, the respondent submitted its bid which included:

(i) A duly completed Bid Form to supply coal for 15 years. This form was signed by the respondent's Deputy Managing Director, Mr Pan Wanze;

(ii) A Bid Bond dated 2 December 2002, issued jointly by Standard Chartered Bank Malaysia Bhd and the respondent in the sum of RM500,000; and

(iii) Technical proposals for the supply of the coal.

[3] The joint bid bond submitted by the respondent was signed by one William Randall who was the lawful attorney of the respondent, pursuant to a Power of Attorney issued by the respondent on 26 November 2002 duly notarised in Hong Kong. This Power of Attorney authorised Randall to negotiate a contract on behalf of the respondent to supply coal to the appellant.

[4] The appellant accepted the respondent's bid and issued a letter of accep

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top