SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1970 MarsdenLR 365

SYED AGIL BARAKBAH
KIONG MAN – Appellant
Versus
KISHEN – Respondent


Advocates:
K DCruz for the plaintiff.
N Ramachandran for the defendant.

JUDGMENTBY: SYED AGIL BARAKBAH J

The plaintiffs claim is for specific performance of an agreement in writing entered into between him and the defendant dated 1st of July, 1960, for the sale by the defendant to the plaintiff of certain land comprised in E.M.R. 459 Lot No. 1174 situated in the mukim of Pilah, in the District of Kuala Pilah, Negri Sembilan, measuring approximately 2 acres. The plaintiff claimed as alternative relief damages for breach of contract and as further alternative relief for recission of the said contract and repayment of the deposit of $ 2,000 paid thereunder with interest at 6% per annum from the first day of July, 1960, until date of realisation, and for a declaration that the plaintiff is entitled to a lien on the said property for his deposit together with interest and damages and costs.

The defendant admits having signed the document dated 1st July, 1960, but avers that he did so in the belief that he was signing an agreement for a lease of a portion of his land, that he did not know what he was signing and that he did not sign an agreement or any document other than an agreement for a lease. Secondly, that he was induced to sign the said agreement by f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top