SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 724

HIGH COURT ENGLAND AND WALES
AZAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
ASSOCIATED NEWSPAPERS LIMITED – Respondent


Table of Content
1. defamation claim facts and context established. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments on justification and jury role in libel. (Para 7 , 8 , 10 , 18 , 34)
3. court observations on context and jury interpretation. (Para 11 , 12 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 20 , 31)
4. claim lacks merit and is bound to fail. (Para 35 , 36)
5. summary judgment granted. (Para 37)
Justice Eady:

[1] The Claimant is Mr Azad Ali, who is a civil servant employed in the Treasury. These libel proceedings relate to allegations published in The Mail on Sunday on 18 January 2009 and repeated the following day in The Daily Mail. Reliance is also placed on the corresponding publications on the Defendants website. The heading for the Sunday (and website) article was "Muslim civil servant suspended over kill British blog" and that for the following day was "Civil servant backed fanatics call to kill our troops in Iraq".

[2] The articles recorded the fact that the Claimant had been suspended from his employment following the posting of a number of remarks on his personal blog published on the Between the Lines website. This is hosted by the Islamic Forum of Europe. In the course of the article passages were cited

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top