SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2011 MarsdenLR 2088

HIGH COURT KUALA LUMPUR
SHENCOURT SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PRIMA AMPANG SDN BHD & ORS – Respondent


GROUNDS OF JUDGMENT

Enclosure 11 is the 1st Defendant's application to strike out the Plaintiff's Writ and Statement of Claim under O. 18 r. (19)(a), (b) and (d) Rules of the High 1980 .

Enclosure 6 is the application by the 3rd Defendant to strike out the Plaintiff's Writ and Statement of Claim under O. 18 r. (19)(a), (b) and (d) Rules of the High 1980 .

Enclosure 4 is the Plaintiff's application for an injunction against the Defendants.

Background:

Gleaning from the Statement Of Claim the following facts are pleaded:

The 1st Defendant is a limited company incorporated under the Companies Act .

The 2nd Defendant was a former director of the 1st Defendant.

The 3rd Defendant is an Architect by profession operating under the name of L.L. Architect and is also a former director of the 1st Defendant.

The 4th Defendant is a lawyer by profession operating under the name of K.S. Lim & Ong, which is the 5th Defendant. At all times the 4th Defendant was acting in his capacity as a lawyer representing Vistana Pancaran Sdn Bhd and also as a former director of the 1st Defendant.

The Plaintiff claims to be the beneficial owner of land title held under HS (D) 121280, PT No. 12054, Mukim &ang, District U

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top