SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2016 MarsdenLR 2425

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
LIWAYWAY MARKETING CORPORATION – Appellant
Versus
OISHI GROUP PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED – Respondent


Zaharah Ibrahim JCA:

Introduction

[1] This was an appeal from the decision of the High Court in Kuala Lumpur allowing the plaintiff s application to have the trade mark "" which was registered in the defendants name under various registrations numbers ("the defendants trade marks") in various classes in the Malaysian Register of Trade Marks ("Register") expunged and removed from the Register.

[2] In this judgment, the parties are referred to as they were in the High Court.

Brief Background Facts

[3] The plaintiff was a company incorporated in Thailand. The defendant was a company incorporated in the Philippines.

[4] The defendants trade marks were registered with the following numbers in the following classes and for the following goods and services:

(1) 00010944, in class 30, for a range of snack food products;

(2) 04009312 in class 29 for "potato chips, crisps, flakes, meat, fish, poultry, meat extracts, preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables, jellied, jam, eggs, milk, edible oils and fats, cheese and pickles";

(3) 05004420 in class 43 for "services for providing food and drink included in class 43";

(4) 05021787 in class 30 for "coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, tapioca, sago, artific

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top