SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2010 MarsdenLR 2524

HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK TAWAU
ALI PUDIN DATUK YUSOF & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. details of the charge against the appellants. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
2. arguments regarding the charge's wording. (Para 6 , 7)
3. discussion on the charge's essential ingredients. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15)
4. court's analysis on the applicability of the rules. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26)
5. final orders and conclusions of the court. (Para 28 , 29)
John Ko Wai Seng JC:

[1] Upon reading the record of appeal and hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the appellants and the learned DPP, I will allow the appeal on the following grounds:-

Charge

[2] The appellants are charged with amended charge as follows:-

"Bahawa kamu pada 10 Disember 2007 lebih kurang jam 11.00 pagi tanpa sebarang kebenaran atau hak yang sah di sisi undang-undang, didapati telah memasuki Hutan Simpan Ulu Segama dalam daerah Perhutanan Lahad Datu yang telah ditutup dengan menggunakan kenderaan Land Cruiser Toyota nombor pendaftaran SA1747T, kenderaan 'pickup' Toyota Hilux nombor pendaftaran SD6811, sebuah jentera traktor jenama Caterpillar dan sebuah Excavator Hitachi model UH04, dengan demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 20(1)(c)(i) Enakmen hutan 1

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top