HIGH COURT SABAH & SARAWAK TAWAU
ALI PUDIN DATUK YUSOF & ORS – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the charge against the appellants. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. arguments regarding the charge's wording. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 3. discussion on the charge's essential ingredients. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court's analysis on the applicability of the rules. (Para 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 26) |
| 5. final orders and conclusions of the court. (Para 28 , 29) |
[1] Upon reading the record of appeal and hearing the submissions of learned counsel for the appellants and the learned DPP, I will allow the appeal on the following grounds:-
Charge
[2] The appellants are charged with amended charge as follows:-
"Bahawa kamu pada 10 Disember 2007 lebih kurang jam 11.00 pagi tanpa sebarang kebenaran atau hak yang sah di sisi undang-undang, didapati telah memasuki Hutan Simpan Ulu Segama dalam daerah Perhutanan Lahad Datu yang telah ditutup dengan menggunakan kenderaan Land Cruiser Toyota nombor pendaftaran SA1747T, kenderaan 'pickup' Toyota Hilux nombor pendaftaran SD6811, sebuah jentera traktor jenama Caterpillar dan sebuah Excavator Hitachi model UH04, dengan demikian kamu telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 20(1)(c)(i) Enakmen hutan 1
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.