SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 398

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YEBET SAMAN & ORS – Appellant
Versus
FOONG KWAI LONG & ORS – Respondent


Table of Content
1. plaintiffs' claim related to customary land rights. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. dispute over common law rights versus aboriginal peoples act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
3. court's stance on coexistence of common law and statutory rights. (Para 7 , 10 , 12)
4. need for oral evidence to resolve factual issues. (Para 8 , 9 , 11 , 13 , 14)

[1] This appeal arises out of a decision of the High COURT dated 29th October 2013, dismissing the Plaintiffs claim without no order as to costs as agreed between parties hence the appeal before us. For purposes of convenience we will refer to the appellants as the plaintiffs and the respondents as the defendants.

[2] This appeal raises several interesting points of law and fact over the plaintiffs claim to the said land, the subject matter of this dispute based on common law and customary rights.

[3] The Background Facts

i. The plaintiffs belong to the Semaq Beri subgroup of the 'Senoi' category of the Orang Asli (see pp 135-136, AR 2(1))

ii. Their purported claim to the said lands (ie Kampung Mengkapur) cover an area of approximately 7000 acres (the said Land). It includes two primary settlement areas namely, 'Çhahabuk' and 'Tumpesel'. Apart from settleme

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top