SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 MarsdenLR 116

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ABDUL RAHMAN TALIB – Appellant
Versus
SEENIVASAGAM & ANOR – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RHV Rintoul,GS Hill ,Respondent Advocate: Chan Nyarn Hoi

JUDGMENT

Hepworth J:

[1] The plaintiff who resides at 24, Kia Peng Road, Kuala Lumpur, was at all material times the Minister for Education or the Minister for Health in the Government of the Federation of Malaya.

[2] The 1st defendant who resides at 7, Hale Street, Ipoh, Perak, is an advocate and solicitor of the High Court in Malaya and was at all material times a Member of the House of Representatives of the Federation of Malaya.

[3] The 2nd defendant who resides at 12, Jalan Kramat, Dato Kramat, Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, was at all material times a business man and company director.

[4] On the 11 September 1963, at a meeting at the Chinese Assembly Hall, Kuala Lumpur, at which large numbers of the members of the public and press representatives, variously estimated to number between 500 and 700 persons, were present the 1st defendant, addressing the plaintiff and those present through a microphone and loudspeakers available for the purpose, said the following words referring to the plaintiff:

"You (meaning the plaintiff) allege that I besmirched your character in the House. You are wrong, because you could have asked the House to punish me under Standing Orders with a maximum penalty o

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top