SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2013 MarsdenLR 2281

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
PAPER AND PAPER PRODUCTS MANUFACTURING EMPLOYEES UNION – Appellant
Versus
ORNAPAPER INDUSTRY (M) SDN BHD – Respondent
Award No: 514 Of 2013 [Case No: 1/2-509/08]



Petitioner Advocates:Arun Kumar ,Respondent Advocate: T Kavitha

The court affirmed the union's legal standing post-reinstatement of the case following the lack of opposition from the respondent and previous appellate rulings supporting the union's claims.

Headnote:(A) Industrial Relations Act 1967 - Section 26(1) - Reference order by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources regarding a trade dispute on the first collective agreement between the parties - The union withdrew its case after the High Court's ruling against its recognition - The Court of Appeal allowed the union's appeal and the Minister's decision, subsequently leading to the dismissal of the respondent's application for leave to appeal by the Federal Court - The respondent did not object to the application for reinstatement of the case - The case is reinstated. (Paras [1]-[5])

(B) Legal standing of the union - Recognition of unions and the authority of the Minister in trade disputes - Union's standing reinstated following procedural compliance and lack of objections from the respondent. (Para [4])

Facts of the case:
A trade dispute arose regarding the terms of a collective agreement, which previously saw the union withdraw its case after a High Court decision. The Court of Appeal reversed this, allowing the union's appeal and the Minister's authority.

Findings of Court:
The reinstatement of the case was granted without objections from the respondent, affirming the union's legal standing in this dispute.

Issues: The court addressed whether the union should retain recognition and the implications of the High Court's prior ruling.

Ratio Decidendi: The reinstatement of the case was justified as the union's procedural rights were upheld and the respondent's lack of opposition indicated consent to the restoration of proceedings.

Result: The case is reinstated.

Table of Content
1. trade dispute reference and recognition issues. (Para 1)

[1] This is an order of reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources pursuant to s 26(1), Industrial Relations Act 1967 of a trade dispute on the terms of the first collective agreement between the parties.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top