SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2014 MarsdenLR 1020

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NOLOSE ALBERT RALESHOME – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant charged with drug trafficking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. police operation and evidence collection details. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9)
3. appellant's arguments regarding evidence credibility. (Para 10 , 11)
4. court analysis of evidence reliability and contradictions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)

[1] Nolose Albert Raleshome ("appellant"), a citizen of Lesotho was charged and tried for trafficking in 707.5 grams of methamphetamine before the Kuala Lumpur High Court, an offence in contravention of s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("DDA"), and punishable with mandatory death penalty prescribed under s 39B(2) of the .

[2] The offence was said to have been committed on 30 December 2010 at about 12.00 noon at the parking space of Food Court 118, Jalan 9, Taman Len Seng, in the District of Cheras, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur.

[3] The learned High Court Judge, at the conclusion of the trial, convicted the appellant on the charge and sentenced him to the mandatory death penalty and against that conviction he had appealed to this Court.

[4] We heard his appeal and after hearing oral arguments, we reserved judgment. We now give our judgm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top