COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NOLOSE ALBERT RALESHOME – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant charged with drug trafficking. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. police operation and evidence collection details. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. appellant's arguments regarding evidence credibility. (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. court analysis of evidence reliability and contradictions. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
[1] Nolose Albert Raleshome ("appellant"), a citizen of Lesotho was charged and tried for trafficking in 707.5 grams of methamphetamine before the Kuala Lumpur High Court, an offence in contravention of s 39B(1)(a) of the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952 ("DDA"), and punishable with mandatory death penalty prescribed under s 39B(2) of the .
[2] The offence was said to have been committed on 30 December 2010 at about 12.00 noon at the parking space of Food Court 118, Jalan 9, Taman Len Seng, in the District of Cheras, Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur.
[3] The learned High Court Judge, at the conclusion of the trial, convicted the appellant on the charge and sentenced him to the mandatory death penalty and against that conviction he had appealed to this Court.
[4] We heard his appeal and after hearing oral arguments, we reserved judgment. We now give our judgm
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.