PS GILL
KS SIVANANTHAN – Appellant
Versus
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the plaintiff sustained injuries from an accident requiring medical treatment. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. the apportionment of liability among parties is central to the appeal. (Para 3 , 4) |
PS Gill J:
The plaintiff was involved in a motor vehicle accident on 4 September 1983 at about 5.00am. He was admitted to Ipoh General Hospital (hereinafter referred to as GH) at about 5.45am the same day. He sustained a 2 cm lacerated wound over his right eyebrow and a fractured upper third of the right tibia. At (GH, his wound was treated and a full length plaster of paris (POP) was applied to his leg. He remained at GH until 9.45am the next day. The plaintiff apparently dissatisfied with the care he received decided to discharge himself at his own risk (AOR). He then admitted himself to Fatimah Hospital at Ipoh (hereinafter referred to as FH) on the same day (ie, 5 September 1983) at about 12.00 noon. He was attended to by the appellant, Dr. Sivananthan. The appellant apparently, immediately split the POP and did an operative procedure called fasciotomy on the plaintiff's leg. On 12 September 1983, he put an internal fixator in the plaintiff's leg to treat the fracture. After t
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.