Nik Hashim FCJ:

The Questions

[1] On 18 April 2006, this Court granted leave to appeal on the following questions:-

(i) Whether it is opened to an appellate Court to totally disregard (in the sense of not adverting at all to) the evidence and findings of two (2) experts one of whom was a Senior Government Chemist and Director of the Chemistry Department, Perak, Mr Amar Singh (PW9) and the other a respected retired Professor of Chemistry at the University Malaya, Professor Dato' (Dr) Chan Kai Cheong (PW11) who both conducted investigations and tests of the site on the issue of arson, which issue is the most crucial in these proceedings and that significantly their evidence and findings had cast serious doubts that the fire was a result of arson and that it could have been caused by ''spontaneous combustion'' and whether it is competent for the Court of Appeal to rely more on the so called circumstantial evidence as opposed to the direct and scientific evidence in reversing a decision of a trial Court.

(ii) Whether it is competent for the Court of Appeal to hold that the acts of a single shareholder/Director binds the company when the shareholder/Director was not acting in the c