SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 1108

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
WAN SAGAR WAN EMBONG – Appellant
Versus
HARUN TAIB – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Arifin Zakaria FCJ:

Background Facts

[1] The appellant (petitioner in the court below and in this judgment will also be referred to as "the petitioner") stood as a candidate for Barisan Nasional in the recent general election, held on 8 March 2008 for the State Legislative Assembly constituency N. 22, Manir, Terengganu. He lost to the Parti Islam Se Malaysia candidate, the respondent in the present appeal, by a majority of 406 votes. Dissatisfied with the said election result he filed an election petition at the High court at Kuala Terengganu seeking the following reliefs:

1. A declaration that the election for State Assembly Seat N. 22 Manir, Terengganu, held on 8 March 2008 be declared invalid and void;

2. For a declaration that the respondent was not duly elected or ought not to have been returned at such election;

3. A determination and direction pursuant to s 36 of the Election Offences Act 1954 ("the Act") ;

4. Further other reliefs as the court deems fit;

5. Costs of the petition.

[2] At the hearing of the petition learned counsel for the respondent raised five grounds as preliminary objection. Having heard submissions of parties the learned election judge, upheld the prelim

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top