SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1997 MarsdenLR 2312

AUGUSTINE PAUL
MOHAMMAD BIN HASSAN – Appellant
Versus
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR – Respondent


Advocates:
G Subramaniam Nair ( Maniam Nair & Co) for the appellant.
Anslem Charles Fernandis (Deputy Public Prosecutor) for the respondent.

JUDGMENTBY: AUGUSTINE PAUL JC

: The charge preferred against the accused in this appeal in the Magistrates Court at Jasin is in the following terms:

Bahawa kamu pada jam lebih kurang 10.30 malam 27 Ogos 1996 di sebuah

rumah bernombor 38, Batu 13, Jalan Bunga Raya, Simpang Pantai,

Merlimau, Melaka telah didapati di dalam milikan kamu sekeping Permit

Masuk No A 323943 di atas Penama SUPRIADI BIN ROSLAN dan bertindak

sebagai orang tengah untuk menjual permit masuk tersebut. Dengan yang

demikian, kamu telah didapati dalam perbuatan kamu sebagai persediaan

untuk menjual suatu Permit Masuk No A 323943 yang didapati palsu dan

telah melakukan satu kesalahan di bawah s 56(1A)(b) Akta Imigresen

1959/63 (seperti yang dipinda oleh Akta Imigresen (Pindaan) 1989) dan

boleh dihukum di bawah s 57 Akta yang sama.

The accused pleaded guilty before the learned magistrate who convicted him and imposed a sentence of one years imprisonment. One of the factors that the learned magistrate took into consideration in passing sentence as stated in his grounds of judgment is as follows:

Menurut fakta kes pendakwaan, tertuduh telah didapati m

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top