SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 MarsdenLR 345

AZMI, MACINTYRE, SUFFIAN
TOPAIWAH – Appellant
Versus
SALLEH – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - KE Hilborne; M/s. Hilborne & Co. For the respondent - PK Nathan; M/s. Elyas Majeed & Co.

JUDGMENT

Azmi (Malaya) CJ:

This is an appeal against the quantum of damages awarded by the High Court at Johore Bahru. The learned Judge awarded $32,012.60 altogether being (1) $5,675 special damages (2) $27,337.60 general damages.

The general damages are made up of two items: -

(1)$8,337.60 for future loss of earnings,

(2)$19,000 for pain and suffering and loss of amenities.

There is no complaint against the award of $8,337.60 for future loss of earnings but it is against the award for special damages and that for pain and suffering and loss of amenities that the appellant complains.

Now as to the award for special damages first. It was contended that this should not be awarded at all or if an award under this item should be made it should be only for loss of wages for nine months which would amount to $270 x 9 = $2,430. Before I refer to the argument on the question of special damages, I had better refer to the pleadings. Para 7 of the statement of claim says as follows:

The plaintiff was aged 40 years and worked as a kampong worker earning at an average of $10 a day. As a result of the aforesaid negligence the plaintiff has been unable to continue in his employment and has

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top