SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2005 MarsdenLR 42

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
BRE SDN BHD & ORS – Appellant
Versus
TUN DATUK PATINGGI HJ ABDUL RAHMAN YAKUB – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Sim Hui Chuang ,Respondent Advocate: Chong Siew Chiang,Cheng Hui Hang

JUDGMENT

Hashim Yusoff JCA:

[1] This is an appeal against the decision of the learned High Court Judge in Kuching given on 28 February 1995. We heard this appeal and reserved our judgment to be given at a later date. We now give our judgment.

Facts Of The Case

[2] The respondent (the plaintiff in the Court below) filed a claim against the appellants (the defendants in the Court below) for damages as well as for an injunction and costs for libel contained in an article (exh P1 A) appearing in a daily newspaper in Sarawak called "The People's Mirror" published on 22 June 1986 (hereinafter referred to as "the said article"). The said article was featured as follows:

Why stoop so low to scoop so little.

Dear Editor,

The Nomination Day for the Oya, N32 on 17th June was a very colourful and memorable one.

I was there and it was indeed a rich experience.

I have never seen the commitment to the Barisan Nasional by the people of Batang Oya as open as it was demonstrated on 17 June 1986.

It was indeed a sad day for Tun Rahman to be openly seen supporting and leading a group which is bent on trying to destroy the unity of the people of Batang Oya.

The people have rightly given him an appropriate recepti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top