SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2005 MarsdenLR 2497 ; 2005 MarsdenLR 1

HELILIAH MOHD YUSOF
ROYAYA ABDULLAH – Appellant
Versus
PP – Respondent


Advocates:
For the prosecution - Saiful Hazmi DPP
For the respondent - Edmund Bon; M/s Chooi & Co

JUDGMENT

Heliliah Mohd Yusof J:

Appeal

The appellants were bailors and are appealing against the Sessions Court Judge's order that a sum of RM5,000 out of RM10,000 bail amount be forfeited.

Summary Of The Case

1. The accused, (Novel Michael Thomas) was charged at the Sessions Court of 2 charges of cheating under Penal Code, s. 420 which the two appellants stood as sureties. The sum of RM10,000 was deposited in the Sessions Court as security for the bail bond.

2. On 19 April 2001, the defence counsel raised a preliminary objection on the ground that the ACA has no locus standi to institute and conduct charges under s. Penal Code, s. 420 as the offence was not an offence under the Anti Corruption Act 1997 or a prescribed offence under the Act. The learned Session Court Judge reserved decision on 20 April 2001 and on that day rejected the objection. The trial was then proceeded with the calling of 3 witnesses and was postponed to 25 and 26 July 2001 as the investigation officer was on leave.

3. On 20 April 2001, by a letter the defence counsel filed a petition to the High Court for a revision of the learned Sessions Court Judge's decision rejecting the preliminary objection.

4. O

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top