COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
LIM GUAN ENG – Appellant
Versus
PP & OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
Preliminary
[1] These four appeals came before us on 1 April 1998. Two of them were by Lim Guan Eng whom we shall, throughout this judgment, refer to as "the appellant". The first of these was directed against the conviction and sentence on a charge under s 8A of the Printing Presses and Publications Act 1984 ("the PPPA"). The second was directed against the conviction and sentence upon a charge under s 4(1)(b) of the Sedition Act 1948. The other two appeals were by the Public Prosecutor who complained that the sentence passed upon the appellant in respect of each proved offence was inadequate. Although the appeals by the Public Prosecutor were lodged earlier in point of time, we decided to hear the appellant's appeals first. Counsel for the appellant and the learned deputies who appeared for the respondent agreed to this course.
[2] After carefully considering the arguments addressed to us, we dismissed the appellant's appeal against conviction and sentence, but allowed the respondent's cross-appeal. We set aside the sentence passed upon the appellant by the High Court on each charge. We then sentenced the appellant to 18 months imprisonment on each charge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.