SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2003 MarsdenLR 1514 ; 2003 MarsdenLR 1

GOPAL SRI RAM, MOHD GHAZALI YUSOFF, RICHARD MALANJUM
ARAB-MALAYSIAN FINANCE BHD – Appellant
Versus
STEVEN PHOA CHENG LOON – Respondent


Advocates:
For the appellant - Cecil Abraham (Dhinesh Bhaskaran & Miriam George); M/s Shearn Delamore & Co
For the 1st-73rd respondents - Rajendra Navaratnam (Yatiswara Ramachandran & Darian Yoong); M/s Azman Davidson & Co
For the 74th respondent - Rohatul Akhmar; Jabatan Pemegang Harta
For the 76th respondent - Melvin Selvam; M/s Jagjit & Co
For the 77th respondent - VS Viswanathan; M/s VS Viswa & Co
(Civil Appeal No: W-01-67-2000)
For the appellant - VS Viswanathan; M/s VS Viswa & Co
For the 1st-73rd respondents - Rajendra Navaratnam (Yatiswara Ramachandran & Darian Yoong); M/s Azman Davidson & Co
For the 74th respondent - Rohatul Akhmar; Jabatan Pemegang Harta
For the 76th respondent - Melvin Selvam; M/s Jagjit & Co
For the 77th respondent - Cecil Abraham (Dhinesh Bhaskaran & Miriam George); Shearn Delamore & Co
(Civil Appeal No: W-01-69-2000)
For the appellant - Yap Mow Jiun; M/s Heng & Mogan
For the 1st-73rd respondents - Rajendra Navaratnam (Yatiswara Ramachandran & Darian Yoong); M/s Azman Davidson & Co
For the 74th respondent - Rohatul Akhmar; Jabatan Pemegang Harta
For the 76th respondent - Melvin Selvam; M/s Jagjit & Co
For the 77th respondent - VS Viswanathan; M/s VS Viswa & Co
For the 78th respondent - Cecil Abraham (Dhinesh Bhaskaran & Miriam George); M/s Shearn Delamore & Co
(Civil Appeal No: W-02-62-2000)
For the appellant - Melvin Selvam; M/s Jagjit & Co
For the 1st-73rd respondents - Rajendra Navaratnam (Yatiswara Ramachandran & Darian Yoong); Azman Davidson & Co
For the 74th respondent - Rohatul Akhmar; Jabatan Pemegang Harta
For the 76th respondent - VS Viswanathan; M/s VS Viswa & Co
For the 77th respondent - Cecil Abraham (Dhinesh Bhaskaran & Miriam George); M/s Shearn Delamore & Co

JUDGMENT

Gopal Sri Ram JCA (Judgment Of The Court):

Facts And Background

We must say at the very outset that after hearing full argument over four days, we find these appeals to be tolerably plain. They entail no new point of policy or principle. At the end of the day this is merely a case calling for an application of settled law to particular facts. And a brief narrative of those facts is as follows.

Along Jalan Ulu Kelang there is a residential area known as Taman Hillview. It comprises of bungalows and high rise apartments. At all times material to the present litigation there were three tower blocks that stood there. They were called Block 1, 2 and 3. They stood in fairly close proximity to each other. They were all constructed between 1975 and 1978. The trial judge treated them for the purposes of the present litigation as a single unit. All before us are agreed that they should be so treated. Behind these three blocks is a hill. There is a stream that flows along it. At one time that stream used to flow its course.

On 11 December 1993, after continuous rainfall for the preceding ten days, Block 1 collapsed. Many people lost their lives in consequence. It had a serious impact

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top