FAISAL @ IBRAHIM SIRAJ & ANOR vs PENTADBIRAN TANAH DAERAH HULU LANGAT & ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 2030

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
FAISAL @ IBRAHIM SIRAJ & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIRAN TANAH DAERAH HULU LANGAT & ORS – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Selva Kumaran Kamalanathan,Edieka Isma Danieal Kaswadi ,Respondent Advocate: Khairul Nizam Abu Bakar,Husna Abdul Halim

Table of Content
1. appeal against high court's decision. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. background facts of land ownership dispute. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
3. claims of ownership by plaintiffs and d7. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
4. high court's analysis of title ownership. (Para 21 , 22 , 23)
5. grounds of appeal submitted by parties. (Para 24 , 25)
6. court's decision on title rectification. (Para 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35)
7. d7 not entitled to damages. (Para 36)
8. final decision and orders of the court. (Para 37)

Azman Abdullah JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by the Appellants (Plaintiffs) against the decision of the High Court dated 9 April 2021 in which the epicentre of the disputes between the Plaintiffs and the Respondents/Defendants is evolving around the land held under GM 6026, Lot 5633, Negeri Selangor, Daerah Hulu Langat, Mukim Hulu Langat ("Lot 5633") whereby there are two issued documents of title issued for the same plot of land.

[2] The High Court had dismissed the Plaintiffs' claim and allowed the counterclaim of 4th respondent (7th defendant) and ordered as follows:

"Maka adalah diperintahkan bahawa tuntutan balas defendan ketujuh a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 2030

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYAFAISAL @ IBRAHIM SIRAJ & ANOR – AppellantVersusPENTADBIRAN TANAH DAERAH HULU LANGAT & ORS – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
FAISAL @ IBRAHIM SIRAJ & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
PENTADBIRAN TANAH DAERAH HULU LANGAT & ORS – Respondent