SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2008 MarsdenLR 167

INDUSTRIAL COURT, KUALA LUMPUR
KESATUAN KEBANGSAAN PEKERJA-PEKERJA PERDAGANGAN – Appellant
Versus
BUMIPUTRA-COMMERCE FACTORLEASE BERHAD – Respondent


AWARD

Franklin Goonting:-

[1] This trade dispute concerns the proposed terms of a Collective Agreement for the period 1 January 2003 to 31 December 2005. As named in the ministerial reference the union/applicant is Kesatuan Kebangsaan Pekerja-Pekerja Perdagangan(NUCW) while the respondent is Bumiputra Commerce Factorlease Berhad.

[2] On 30 August 2007 NUCW filed an application to join the National Union of Bank Employees (NUBE) and CIMB Bank Berhad (CIMB) as parties to the dispute. The court understands this to mean that NUCW wants itself to be substituted by NUBE and the respondent to be substituted by CIMB. It is an extraordinary application in that it seeks a replacement of parties on both sides of the contention ie. the contender and the defender, by outsiders. When asked by the court whether there was any precedent for it, Mr. Chandra, counsel for NUCW, candidly replied in the negative, adding that he was trying to cover new ground.

[3] Supportive and opposing affidavits, and written submissions were filed and the court and its panel heard further oral submissions on 30 July 2008 and it now gives its ruling. The facts wherever referred to herein are gleaned from the said affidavit




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top