HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
ONG YEW TEIK – Appellant
Versus
YEE TECK FAH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
[1] This is the Plaintiff's appeal against the decision made by the Advocates and Solicitors Disciplinary Board ("DB") on 18 July 2020 under s 103D of the Legal Profession Act 1976 .
[2] In this appeal, the Plaintiff seek for the following orders and reliefs:
2.1. A declaration that the Plaintiff had not been notified by the DB of its decision and the time to lodge the appeal is at large;
2.2. In the alternative, an order that leave be granted to enlarge time to appeal against the decision of the DB;
2.3. An order to reverse the decision of the DB;
2.4. An order that:
2.4.1 The Plaintiff's Complaint No DC/16/9038 be allowed;
2.4.2 There is finding of liability against the Defendant;
2.4.3 The Defendant be struck off the Roll of Advocates and Solicitors; and
2.4.4 In the alternative, penalties, or punishments under s 103C of the Legal Profession Act 1976 be ordered as this Court deems fit and proper;
2.4.5 Costs of the Appeal be paid by the Defendant to the Plaintiff
Background Facts
[3] The Plaintiff was a founder and shareholder of Euroceramic Technologies Company Limited, a private limited company incorporated in Thailand ("ECT").
[4] On or about 6 November 200
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.