SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 434

FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
N CHANTHIRAN NAGAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
KAO CHE JEN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Alvin Chong Chee Vun,Jonathan ,Respondent Advocate: Lim Heng Choo,Analissa Lim

Table of Content
1. leave of court required for proceedings against liquidators. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. contributory's failure to obtain leave impacts the appeal's legitimacy. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
Nallini Pathmanathan FCJ:

A. Introduction

[1] The sole issue in this appeal is whether leave of Court is required for the commencement of proceedings against a Court-appointed liquidator.

[2] The long-established position in this jurisdiction is that leave is obtained from the winding-up Court prior to such commencement. However, in two recent decisions, namely Kao Che Jen v. N Chanthiran Nagappan , 2015 MarsdenLR 216 ('Kao Che Jen') and the instant appeal, the Court of Appeal has departed from this long-established position. It is therefore incumbent upon this Court to clarify the relevant legal principles in this regard.

B. Background Facts

[3] The respondent, Kao Che Jen is a contributory and director ('the Contributory') of one STM Transformers Sdn Bhd ('the Company'). On 9 May 2013, one Ong Jin Ek, another contributory of the Company, filed a petition to wind up the Company on just and equitable grounds pursuant to s 218(1)(i) of the Companies Act 1965 ('the 1965 Act'). The Company was consequent

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top