FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
N CHANTHIRAN NAGAPPAN – Appellant
Versus
KAO CHE JEN – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. leave of court required for proceedings against liquidators. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. contributory's failure to obtain leave impacts the appeal's legitimacy. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
A. Introduction
[1] The sole issue in this appeal is whether leave of Court is required for the commencement of proceedings against a Court-appointed liquidator.
[2] The long-established position in this jurisdiction is that leave is obtained from the winding-up Court prior to such commencement. However, in two recent decisions, namely Kao Che Jen v. N Chanthiran Nagappan , 2015 MarsdenLR 216 ('Kao Che Jen') and the instant appeal, the Court of Appeal has departed from this long-established position. It is therefore incumbent upon this Court to clarify the relevant legal principles in this regard.
B. Background Facts
[3] The respondent, Kao Che Jen is a contributory and director ('the Contributory') of one STM Transformers Sdn Bhd ('the Company'). On 9 May 2013, one Ong Jin Ek, another contributory of the Company, filed a petition to wind up the Company on just and equitable grounds pursuant to s 218(1)(i) of the Companies Act 1965 ('the 1965 Act'). The Company was consequent
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.