HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TANASILAN NAKETHIRAN – Appellant
Versus
PP & ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. outline of case facts and procedural history. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments concerning constitutional validity of sosma. (Para 9 , 10 , 18) |
| 3. discussion on judicial powers and societal security. (Para 11 , 12 , 14) |
[1] The Applicant was arrested on 20 June 2021 and subsequently detained under subsection 4(5) of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 ("SOSMA") from 20 June 2021 to 13 July 2021.
[2] On 28 June 2021, the Applicant filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus against the 28 days of his detention under SOSMA at the Kuala Lumpur High Court.
[3] On 13 July 2021, the Applicant was charged under s 130V(1) of the Penal Code before the Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur.
[4] The High Court then dismissed the Applicant's Writ of Habeas Corpus application on the ground that the application has been rendered academic. The Applicant appealed to the Federal Court.
[5] On 11 January 2022, the Federal Court heard the appeal and remitted the case to the High Court and directed the Habeas Corpus application to be heard on its merits.
[6] The Habeas Corpus application was heard on its merits and on 8 June 2022, the High Court ruled that there has bee
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.