SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 747

HIGH COURT MALAYA KUALA LUMPUR
TANASILAN NAKETHIRAN – Appellant
Versus
PP & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Rajpal Singh,Jayarubbiny Jayaraj,Jay Moy Wei Jiun ,Respondent Advocate: Ermadieyani Ismadi

Noorin Badaruddin J:

[1] The Applicant was arrested on 20 June 2021 and subsequently detained under subsection 4(5) of the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act 2012 ("SOSMA") from 20 June 2021 to 13 July 2021.

[2] On 28 June 2021, the Applicant filed a Writ of Habeas Corpus against the 28 days of his detention under SOSMA at the Kuala Lumpur High Court.

[3] On 13 July 2021, the Applicant was charged under s 130V(1) of the Penal Code before the Sessions Court in Kuala Lumpur.

[4] The High Court then dismissed the Applicant's Writ of Habeas Corpus application on the ground that the application has been rendered academic. The Applicant appealed to the Federal Court.

[5] On 11 January 2022, the Federal Court heard the appeal and remitted the case to the High Court and directed the Habeas Corpus application to be heard on its merits.

[6] The Habeas Corpus application was heard on its merits and on 8 June 2022, the High Court ruled that there has been a procedural noncompliance with subsection 4(2) of SOSMA but no Writ of Habeas Corpus was issued as the Applicant is now in remand pending trial for a charge under s 130V of the Penal Code.

[7] On 8 November 2022, the Applicant filed a second

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top