SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1988 MarsdenLR 1062

WAN YAHYA
GOVERNMENT OF MALAYSIA – Appellant
Versus
CHONG WOO YIT – Respondent


Advocates:
Chong Kim Kong for the appellant/defendant.
Shaharuddin Ali (Senior Federal Counsel) for the respondent/plaintiff.
Solicitors: Koh Kim Leng & Co.

Wan Yahya J

The facts leading to this appeal may be shortly summarized as follows. On 16 March 1985, the Inland Revenue Department ("the Revenue") made additional assessments in respect of the appellant's (taxpayer) income for the previous years of assessments for the following amounts: Year of Assessment 1959 for additional tax of$20.04 Year of Assessment 1961 for additional tax of$15,301.60 Year of Assessment 1963 for additional tax of$1,831.95 Year of Assessment 1964 for additional tax of$4,538.70 Year of Assessment 1965 for additional tax of$7,054.00 Year of Assessment 1966 for additional tax of$62,276.50 Year of Assessment 1968 for additional tax of$8,329.75 Total $99,352.54

It is notable from the above that the additional assessments were made retrogressively, the last mentioned year being a period of 16 years and the first mentioned date going right back to about 26 years from the date on which the actual additional assessments were computed. Notices of the assessments were posted to the appellant on the same date. On 21 December 1985, the Revenue took out a writ of summons against the taxpayer for a sum, which after the addition of penalties for late payments, amounted to $

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top