AHMAD NAZMI AB TALIB vs PRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1989

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
AHMAD NAZMI AB TALIB – Appellant
Versus
PRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Damian Kiethan,Nicholas Neto ,Respondent Advocate: Muhamad Sharulnizam Mat Roni

Table of Content
1. introduction of parties and employment details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual background of the termination. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. claimant's arguments regarding bankruptcy and employment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. documents considered for hearing. (Para 12)
5. role and function of the industrial court. (Para 13 , 14)
6. burden of proof in dismissal cases. (Para 15 , 16)
7. court's findings on the first charge. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
8. court's findings on the second charge. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
9. court's findings on the third charge. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. court's findings on the fourth charge. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
11. validity of the domestic inquiry. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. proportionality of the punishment. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
13. final decision and conclusion. (Para 49)
14. conclusion and order. (Para 50)

Syed Noh Said Nazir @ Nadzir:

Reference

[1] This is a reference made by the Minister under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the Act") arising out of the dismissal of AHMAD NAZMI BIN AB TALIB (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by PRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD (hereinafter referred to as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1989

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPURAHMAD NAZMI AB TALIB – AppellantVersusPRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent

Cases Referred (4)

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
AHMAD NAZMI AB TALIB – Appellant
Versus
PRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent