SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 MarsdenLR 2272

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
AHMAD NAZMI AB TALIB – Appellant
Versus
PRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD – Respondent
Award No: 1593 Of 2023 [Case No: 21/4-27/20]



Petitioner Advocates:Damian Kiethan,Nicholas Neto ,Respondent Advocate: Muhamad Sharulnizam Mat Roni

The dismissal of an employee must be supported by proven misconduct on a balance of probabilities, and the employer has the burden to establish just cause for termination.

Headnote:(A) Industrial Relations Act 1967 - Section 20(3) - Dismissal of employee - Claimant dismissed for bankruptcy, misconduct, conflict of interest, and tarnishing company image - Court found dismissal was with just cause after evaluating charges of misconduct and Domestic Inquiry - The company proved the misconduct on the balance of probabilities. (Paras 1, 49, 50)

(B) Employment Law - Misconduct - The burden of proof lies on the employer to establish that the dismissal was with just cause - The court must determine if the misconduct complained of was established and whether it constituted just cause for dismissal. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
The Claimant was employed as Chief Digital Officer and was dismissed for alleged bankruptcy and misconduct involving personal use of company drivers and conflict of interest while holding directorships in competing businesses. (Paras 3, 4, 7)

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Claimant's actions constituted serious misconduct, justifying dismissal. The Domestic Inquiry was conducted fairly, and the Claimant was given opportunities to defend himself. (Paras 42, 49)

Issues: The key issues were whether the alleged misconduct was proven and if the dismissal was with just cause. (Paras 16)

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that the employer must prove the misconduct on a balance of probabilities, and the Claimant's actions breached company policy and trust, warranting dismissal. (Paras 15, 49)

Result: Claim dismissed.

Table of Content
1. introduction of parties and employment details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. factual background of the termination. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. claimant's arguments regarding bankruptcy and employment. (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. documents considered for hearing. (Para 12)
5. role and function of the industrial court. (Para 13 , 14)
6. burden of proof in dismissal cases. (Para 15 , 16)
7. court's findings on the first charge. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
8. court's findings on the second charge. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
9. court's findings on the third charge. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37)
10. court's findings on the fourth charge. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41)
11. validity of the domestic inquiry. (Para 42 , 43 , 44 , 45)
12. proportionality of the punishment. (Para 46 , 47 , 48)
13. final decision and conclusion. (Para 49)
14. conclusion and order. (Para 50)
Syed Noh Said Nazir @ Nadzir:

Reference

[1] This is a reference made by the Minister under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 ("the Act") arising out of the dismissal of AHMAD NAZMI BIN AB TALIB (hereinafter referred to as "the Claimant") by PRASARANA MALAYSIA BERHAD (hereinafter referred to as "the Company") on 19 April 2019

Introduction Of Parties

The Company

[2] The Company drives the transformation of Malaysia's public transportation systems and services. The Company owns and operates the country's urban rail services that include three LRT networks and the KL Monorail, in addition to operating the MRT line. The Company also owns and operates the stage bus services in Kuala Lumpur, Selangor, Penang and Pahang. It also provides management and engineering consultancy services locally and abroad, undertakes commercial and transit oriented development projects within its assets as well as key public transport infrastructure projects in the country.

The Claimant

[3] The Claimant's employment with the Company began on or about 30 November 2018; when the claimant was hired as the company's Chief Digital Officer, (Grade I) ("CDO") for a period of thirty-six (36) months from 30 November 2018 to 29 November 2021 ("the contract period"). 4, The Claimant was tasked to head the Digitalization and Technology division of the Company; and reported to the then President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company. The Claimant joined the Company; after being head-hunted by the Company upon the recommendations of the CEO.

Factual Matrix

Events Which Led To The Termination Of The Claimant's Services As The CDO Of The Company

The Show Cause Letter

[4] By a Show Cause Letter dated 19 March 2019, the Claimant was required to provide a written explanation on the following allegations:

"1) (a) That you, Dato' Ahmad Nazmi Ab Talib as the Chief Digital Officer of Prasarana Malaysia Berhad have been adjudicated a bankrupt in the High Court of Malaya at Shah Alami in the State of Selangor (Ref No: BA-29NCC-7578-08/2017) on 5 July 2018 and under cl 15 (Summary 11 Dismissal) of your Contract of Employment dated 3 December 2018, "The Company may terminate the employment of the Employee with immediate effect without notice, salary or other forms of compensation if; (15.4) the Employee becomes bankrupt or makes any arrangement or composition with his creditors generally";

(b) That you, Dato' Ahmad Nazmi Ab Talib as the Chief Digital Officer of Prasarana Malaysia Berhad have been alleged to commit a misconduct as stipulated in the Human Capital Policy under cl 8.2.4 "A misconduct would also be construed even though it is committed outside the premises of Prasarana Group and after working hours, under the following circumstances; 8.2.4 (e) The act resulted in serious pecuniary embarrassment eg being declared a bankrupt.

2) That you, Dato' Ahmad Nazmi Ab Talib as the Chief Digital Officer of Prasarana Malaysia Berhad have been alleged to abuse the benefit provided to you under cl 7.2 (Driver) of your Contract of Employment dated 3 December 2018, by instructing the drivers named below

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top