RAJA AZLAN SHAH, WAN SULEIMAN, SALLEH ABAS
NGUI MUI KHIN – Appellant
Versus
GILLESPIE BROS.& CO.LTD. – Respondent
Salleh Abas FJ (delivering the judgment of the Court):
In this appeal certain transactions took place in Singapore between the respondents, a London confirming house, and a Singapore company known as Southern Equipment Suppliers (S) Pte. Ltd., relating to the financing of purchases of goods by the latter. The appellants who are the directors of Southern Equipment Suppliers (S) Pte. Ltd. and live in Johore Bharu, gave a guarantee to the respondents with respect to those transactions. The question to be determined in this appeal is whether by entering into those transactions the respondents are a moneylender within the meaning of our Moneylenders'
Ordinance No. 42 of 1951, so that the guarantee which the respondents sought to enforce against the appellants is unenforceable, as to do so would be to undermine our Moneylenders' Ordinance, 1951.
It is a general principle of law that any transaction taking place outside the jurisdiction can only be enforced in the local Courts if they are not contrary to the local law and regulations. Under the continental system the priority of lex lociover lex fori is based on the doctrine of odre public or jus cogens under which any domestic
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.