SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2000 MarsdenLR 1632

MOHAMED DZAIDDIN, ABDUL MALEK AHMAD, WAN ADNAN ISMAIL
MALAYSIA AIR CHARTER COMPANY SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
PETRONAS DAGANGAN SDN BHD – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Mohamed Dzaiddin FCJ:

This appeal is concerned with the interpretation of s. 218(2)(a) of the Companies Act 1965 (the Act) which reads as follows:

(2) A company shall be deemed to be unable to pay its debts if

(a) a creditor by assignment or otherwise to whom the company is indebted in a sum exceeding five hundred ringgit then due has served on the company by leaving at the registered office a demand under his hand or under the hand of his agent thereunto lawfully authorized requiring the company to pay the sum so due, and the company has for three weeks thereafter neglected to pay the sum or to secure or compound for it to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor;

Leave to appeal was granted by this court to the appellant on 20 March 2000 for the determination of the following questions of law:

(a) Whether section 218(2)(a) of the Companies Act 1965 is to be interpreted literally and strictly or widely and liberally.

(b) In the event it is the literal and strict interpretation that ought to be adopted whether the section 218 Notice must quantify and specify the exact and actual sum due as at the date of the demand and leave no further sums/amounts to be calculated/qua

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top