SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1991 MarsdenLR 10

SUPREME COURT KUALA LUMPUR
CREDIT CORP (M) BHD – Appellant
Versus
FONG TAK SIN – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:D P Naban ,Respondent Advocate: Sukhdev Singh

JUDGMENT

Hashim Yeop Sani CJM:

[1] There was a motor accident along the 77th milestone Ipoh/Kuala Lumpur main road on 18 June 1979 between motor vehicle taxi No H5887 and another motor vehicle, a bus No JAB 980. The respondent was injured in the accident. On 16 June 1984 the respondent, as driver of the taxi, took out a writ claiming for special and general damages.

[2] There was also another civil suit filed in Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur Civil Suit C38/82 in respect of the same accident. On 5 March 1984 the former solicitors for the respondent received a letter from the solicitors acting for the driver and owner of the said bus in the Kuala Lumpur civil suit who are now solicitors for the appellant.

[3] for the purpose of this judgment only one is really relevant. The letter appears at p 21 in appeal record dated 15 August 1984 and reads as follows:

Skrine & Co,

Advocates & Solicitors,

Straits Trading Building,

No 4, Leboh Pasar Besar,

50050 Kuala Lumpur

TT/m/90713.T/84

GS/GAP.A 1648/80

15 August 1984

M/s Gurdial Singh & Co

29, 1st Floor

Station Road

Ipoh,

Perak

Dear Sirs,

Re: Kuala Lumpur High Court. Civil Suit No: C38 of 1982

We refer to your letter dated 8 August 1984.

We have no instructions to ac

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top