FEDERAL COURT PUTRAJAYA
ROVIN JOTY KODEESWARAN – Appellant
Versus
LEMBAGA PENCEGAHAN JENAYAH & ORS AND OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
A. Background
[1] The six appellants appealed against the decision of the learned Judicial Commissioner which dismissed the application by the appellants for a writ of habeas corpus. The six appellants were ordered to be detained under s 19A(1) of the Prevention of Crime Act 1959 ( POCA ) by the Chairman/Deputy Chairman of the Prevention of Crime Board (Board) for a period of two years. Pursuant to the order, the respective appellants are to be detained at the respective Pusat Pemulihan Khas (PPK).
B. The Issue In The Appeals
The Basis Of The Challenge
[2] Encik Najib Zakaria, counsel for the five appellants, Rovin Joty Kodeeswaran, Darweesh Raja Sulaim, Ragu Vitee, Devandren James and Velu Rajakumar indicated that he would be raising only one issue before this court, namely, whether s 15B POCA (an ouster clause provision) which purports to limit the exercise of judicial power is ultra viresart 121(1) of the Federal Constitution ( FC ) and therefore unconstitutional.
[3] Dato' Seri Gopal Sri Ram, counsel for the appellant Nivesh Mohan, raised an additional issue in addition to the issue raised by the other five appellants, namely, whether s 7B POCA
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.