[36] It was also shown to the Court that out of 11 columns for the Manager's comment, COW-2 only commented on 4 column and even failed to rate one of the columns in the assessment. The Court is of the view that since COW-2 did not provide details of the assessment ratings in 7 out of 10 Manager's column and failed to rate one of the column in the assessment, the incomplete and improper rating by COW-2 has actually resulted in the unfairly overall ratings given to the Claimant and subjected him to undergo a PCP. The incomplete and improper rating by COW-2 also implies that possibly the reason why COW-2 did not commented and specified details in 7 Manager's column because there were no valid details facts and figures to substantiate her "partially effective" ratings on the Claimant who was under her supervision only for 4 months when she conducted the year end review.

[37] The Court is of the view that the Claimant was not warned about his poor performance right from the mid