SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1995 MarsdenLR 1235

FEDERAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
AUTO DUNIA SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
WONG SAI FATT & ORS – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:RK Nathan ,Respondent Advocate: Guy Vareghese

JUDGMENT

Edgar Joseph Jr FCJ:

[1] This was a defendant's application for leave to appeal to this Court, following the refusal of the Court of Appeal to grant leave to apeal under s 68(1)(a), Courts of Judicature Act 1964 ('the Act') from the decision of the High Court, Ipoh, given in favour of the plaintiffs in a running down case where the decretal sum amounted to less than RM250,000.

[2] At the outset, Counsel for the respondents raised the preliminary objection that no appeal lay to this Court from such a refusal of the Court of Appeal.

1

[3] By s 67 of the Act, jurisdiction is conferred upon the Court of Appeal "to hear and determine appeals from any judgment or order of any High Court in any civil cause or matter.

[4] However, by s 68(1)(a) of the Act, a fetter is imposed on the right to bring such appeals where the value of the subject matter is less than RM250,000 for it provides that:

No appeal shall be brought to the Court of Appeal in any of the following cases:

(a) when the amount or value of the subject-matter of the claim (exclusive of interest) is less than two hundred and fifty thousand ringgit, except with the leave of the Court of Appeal.

[5] So far as the Federal Court, wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top