CIMB BANK BERHAD vs AHMAD SUHAIRI MAT ALI & ANOR

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 MarsdenLR 1681

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CIMB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AHMAD SUHAIRI MAT ALI & ANOR – Respondent

Petitioner Advocates:Thavalingam C Thavarajah,David Tan Seng Keat ,Respondent Advocate: Pravin Kaur Jessy,Nor Azrah Mohd Salim

Table of Content
1. overview of the case and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 6)
2. claimant's arguments against the industrial court's decision. (Para 4 , 5)
3. legal definition and principles of constructive dismissal. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. conditions for proving constructive dismissal. (Para 14 , 15 , 16)
5. court's evaluation of evidence regarding the transfer. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27)
6. judicial review findings and errors in the industrial court's decision. (Para 30 , 31 , 32)
7. final conclusions of the high court regarding constructive dismissal. (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76)

S Nantha Balan JCA:

Introduction

[1] This is an appeal by CIMB Bank Berhad ("the Bank"). The 1st respondent is Ahmad Suhairi Mat Ali. He was the Claimant in the Industrial Court. For convenience, we shall refer to the Appellant as "the Bank", and the 1st respondent as "the Claimant". This is a case of "constructive dismissal". The Claimant's claim was dismissed by the Industrial Court. The High Court allowed Judicial Review and quashed the Award of the Industrial Court and granted the relief of compensation. We have dealt with the law on constructive dismissal in some d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

2023 MarsdenLR 1681

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYACIMB BANK BERHAD – AppellantVersusAHMAD SUHAIRI MAT ALI & ANOR – Respondent

Cases Referred (3)

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
CIMB BANK BERHAD – Appellant
Versus
AHMAD SUHAIRI MAT ALI & ANOR – Respondent