SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 576

INDUSTRIAL COURT KUALA LUMPUR
KHOO KIM LOANG – Appellant
Versus
SHOCK MEDIA STUDIO SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Representing Himself ,Respondent Advocate: Tia Poh Yew

Table of Content
1. court's jurisdiction under law. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. grounds for termination established. (Para 5 , 16)
3. allegations of dismissal for cv fraud. (Para 6)
4. importance of cv verification emphasized. (Para 20 , 21 , 25)
5. trust breach leading to dismissal justified. (Para 23)

[1] This is a reference by the Honourable Minister of Human Resources under s 20(3) of the Industrial Relations Act 1967 (Act 177) (' IRA ') on 28 July 2016 to the Industrial Court arising out of the dismissal of Khoo Kim Loang (hereinafter referred to as 'the claimant') on 6 November 2015 by Shock Media Studio Sdn Bhd (hereinafter referred to as 'the respondent') and was received by the Court on 26 August 2016.

[2] The claimant had seen a vacancy advertised by the respondent in JOBSTREET and he decided to apply for the post of "Sales Consultant" with the respondent. He sent a letter intituled "Job Application" to the respondent as shown in p 5 of the company's Bundle of Documents (hereinafter referred to as "COB1"). In his letter, the claimant stated that he is enclosing a copy of his resume and stated that 'with his training and working experience', he knows that he can contribute to the r

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top