SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 MarsdenLR 475

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
MINMETALS SOUTH-EAST ASIA CORPORATION PTE LTD – Appellant
Versus
NAKHODA LOGISTICS SDN BHD – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Jeremy Joseph,Ms Samuel ,Respondent Advocate: Balan Nair,Elaina Teng

Table of Content
1. facts regarding the appeal and parties involved. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. the plaintiff is appealing the high court's dismissal of their claim for breach of contract against the defendant. (Para 5)
3. the high court found the plaintiff was holder of the bills of lading and entitled to delivery. (Para 23 , 27 , 32)
4. court confirmed plaintiff's ownership and entitlement for delivery of the cargo. (Para 24 , 25)
5. duties concerning cargo delivery and possession hinge on original bills of lading. (Para 29)

[1] This is an appeal by Minmetals South-East Asia Corporation Pte Ltd ('the plaintiff') against the decision of the High Court dismissing its claim against Nakhoda Logistics Sdn Bhd ('the defendant-carrier') for breach of a contract to carry and deliver cargo to the plaintiff. The learned High Court Judge found that the plaintiff failed to prove its claim for USD13,591,622.65 premised on the defendant-carrier's failure to deliver the cargo on presentation on the original bills of lading. The learned High Court Judge also stated alternatively that, if she was wrong on the issue of liability, then the defendant-carrier would only be liable for the sum of RM2,256,968.70

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top