COURT OF APPEAL KUALA LUMPUR
FARLIM PROPERTIES SDN BHD – Appellant
Versus
GOH KEAT POH & ORS (AND OTHER APPEALS) – Respondent
[1] Three appeals were before us. The first appeal, Civil Appeal No P-02-146-2001, is the appeal by the plaintiff against the decision of the learned judge who allowed the defendant's appeal against the decision of the learned senior assistant registrar who dismissed the defendant's applications for striking out under O 18 r 19 of the Rules of the High 1980. In the second appeal, Civil Appeal No P-02-1032-2001, the plaintiff appealed against the decision of another learned judge who dismissed he plaintiff's application for the extension of a Private Caveat No 2669/98 Jilid 541 Folio 184 lodged by it against 41 lots listed therein (except lot 500, Mukim 16, North East District, Penang and lot 1561, Section 3, Town of Air Itam, Penang) until the final disposal of the third appeal. The third appeal, Civil Appeal No P-02-144-2001 is an appeal by the plaintiff against the decision of the learned judge who dismissed the plaintiff's action in consequence of the decision appealed against in Civil Appeal No P-02-146-2001. We heard the first appeal first. We allowed the appeal. As the result, we also allowed the third appeal. We ordered one set of costs here and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.