SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 2694

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
HUP SOON OMNIBUS CO SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
LIM CHEE @ LAM KUM CHEE – Respondent


5.12. The respondent also filed an application under Order 14A of the Rules of COURT 2012, applied to have the matter decided.

5.13. As alluded to earlier in this judgment, the COURT granted the respondents application for an injunction and dismissed the appellants counterclaim.

5.14. Dissatisfied with the impugned decision, the appellant appealed to this COURT.

5.15. Meanwhile, on 31 March 2016, the COURT of Appeal granted the respondents application for security for costs in the sum of RM50,000.00, to be paid within 14 days of the service of the sealed order

5.16. The sealed order was served on 14 June 2016 and the last day for payment of the security for costs was 28 June 2016 but up to the date fixed for hearing of the appeal, it has not been paid as ordered by the COURT of Appeal.

Reasons For Decision

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top