Court orders must be complied with and non-compliance can lead to striking out an appeal.

5.12. The respondent also filed an application under Order 14A of the Rules of COURT 2012, applied to have the matter decided.

5.13. As alluded to earlier in this judgment, the COURT granted the respondents application for an injunction and dismissed the appellants counterclaim.

5.14. Dissatisfied with the impugned decision, the appellant appealed to this COURT.

5.15. Meanwhile, on 31 March 2016, the COURT of Appeal granted the respondents application for security for costs in the sum of RM50,000.00, to be paid within 14 days of the service of the sealed order

5.16. The sealed order was served on 14 June 2016 and the last day for payment of the security for costs was 28 June 2016 but up to the date fixed for hearing of the appeal, it has not been paid as ordered by the COURT of Appeal.

Reasons For Decision

Click Here to Read the rest of this document