SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2017 MarsdenLR 972

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
GANDA SETIA CEMERLANG SDN BHD & ANOR – Appellant
Versus
MAIKA HOLDINGS BERHAD – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellants' claims involve obligations relating to land sale. (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)

[1] The appellants sought leave under s 263(2) of the Companies Act 1965 to commence proceedings against the respondent as the respondent was voluntarily wound up under s 254 of the on 20 May 2015. The application was opposed by the liquidators of the respondent. Leave was refused.

[2] At the appeal, we unanimously allowed the appeal and set aside the decision of the High COURT. Our reasons in full are set out below.

Brief facts

[3] Prior to being wound up, the respondent entered into an agreement dated 21 March 2011 wherein subject to various terms and conditions, the respondent agreed to sell to the 1st appellant two plots of lands for a total purchase consideration of RM3,312,000.00. In respect of the first piece, the respondent together with various individual owners were the registered proprietors of an undivided portion of land held under Geran 94160, Lot 5732, Mukim Batu, Daerah Kuala Langat, Negeri Selangor. Effectively, the respondent sold its shares representing 22.4163 acres to the appellants. This was known as the "bigger plot" and it was sold for RM218,550.60.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top