Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
INDRANI RAMASAMY – Appellant
Versus
KESAVAN SUBRAMANIAM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. parties' arguments and claims. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. court's analysis and observations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 4. ratio decidendi regarding defamation. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49) |
| 5. final conclusion and order. (Para 50) |
Introduction
[1] This is the Appellant's appeal against the decision of the High Court in dismissing the Appellant's claim for defamation against the Respondent on 29 June 2022 delivered after a full trial. The High Court also ordered that parties bear their own costs.
[2] At the High Court the Appellant, Indrani a/p Ramasamy is the Plaintiff married with two children and at all material times was the Treasurer of Parti Keadilan Rakyat, Sungai Siput Branch. The Respondent, Kesavan a/l Subramaniam is the Defendant and at all material times, was the Member of Parliament for Sungai Siput from Parti Keadilan Rakyat.
[3] At a press conference called for by the Defendant on 18 May 2019, the Defendant spoke and published h
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
