Back
COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
NAI NIN SARARAKSH – Appellant
Versus
FIVE STAR HERITAGE SDN BHD & ORS AND OTHER APPEALS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the appeals concerning ag's consent. (Para 1 , 2 , 27) |
| 2. historical context of the trust and its transformation over time. (Para 5 , 6 , 12 , 19) |
| 3. legal implications of a public vs. private trust. (Para 20 , 30 , 34) |
| 4. assessment of consent by the attorney-general. (Para 78 , 89 , 94) |
| 5. final ruling supporting the appeal. (Para 100) |
Introduction
[1] There are three appeals before us. The first, Appeal No P 01(A)-602-10/2021 is between Nai Ninn Sararaksh ("Nai") as the appellant and Five Star Heritage Sdn Bhd and five others as the respondents ("Appeal No 602"). The second is Appeal No P 01(A)-609-10/2021 between Ho Choon Teik ("Ho") as the appellant and the same respondents ("Appeal No 609 "). The third and last is Appeal No P 01(A)-621-10/2021 between Attorney-General Malaysia ("AG") and also the same respondents ("Appeal No 621").
[2] The three appeals arose from the decision of the High Court ("HC") which had allowed an application for judicial review ("JR") filed by the respondents.
[3] Nai, Ho and AG, all opposed that application for JR filed by the respondents at the HC. The application for JR is to challenge the AG's consent
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
