COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
YEO ENG LAM – Appellant
Versus
INFINITY VANTAGE SDN BHD – Respondent
JUDGMENT
A. Introduction
[1] Infinity Vantage Sdn Bhd, the Respondent/Plaintiff, filed an action against one Yeo Eng Lam, the Appellant/Defendant, vide Civil Suit No: NA-22NCvC-57-08/2017 at the High Court in Malaya at Seremban, Negeri Sembilan (the Civil Suit).
[2] The Respondent's/Plaintiffs claim was for breach of contract and the Respondent/Plaintiff was seeking a sum of RM 7,000,000.00 pursuant to a Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) dated 3 October 2014 between the parties. Clause 29.3 of the JVA provides that all disputes between the parties are to be referred to arbitration.
[3] On 17 October 2017, the Appellant/Defendant vide encl 8 at the High Court, filed an application under O 92 r 4 of the Rules of 2012 (ROC) and/or s 10 of the Arbitration Act 2005 (Act 646) to stay the proceedings at the High Court and to essentially refer the dispute to arbitration.
[4] On 8 February 2018, the High Court dismissed the Appellant's/Defendant's application in encl 8 with costs of RM 3,000.00 subject to the payment of the allocatur's fee.
[5] Aggrieved by the said decision, the Appellant/Defendant filed an appeal to this Court.
[6] For the purpose of this appeal, the pa
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.