SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2007 MarsdenLR 913

COURT OF APPEAL PUTRAJAYA
TAN AIK TECK – Appellant
Versus
TANG SOON CHYE – Respondent


Petitioner Advocates:Teh Meng Teck,Jayne Koe,PY Au Yong ,Respondent Advocate: A Onn,HP Chuah,Sarah Benedict

JUDGMENT

Mokhtar Sidin JCA:

[1] We have dismissed this appeal earlier and now we give our reasons for doing so. The appellant was the defendant in the court below while the respondent was the plaintiff. I will refer to the parties as they were in the court below.

[2] The plaintiff's statement of claim, inter alia , stated:

3. Pada 24.1.2000, di atas permintaan Defendan, Plaintif telah bersetuju untuk memberikan pinjaman persahabatan kepada Defendan untuk jumlah wang sebanyak RM1,026,812.02 ("Pinjaman Persahabatan").

(On 24.1.2000, upon the Defendant's request, the Plaintiff agreed to grant a friendly loan to the Defendant in the sum of RM1,026,812.02 ("Friendly Loan")).

4. Di atas dasar persahabatan yang terjalin di antara Plaintif dan Defendan dan di atas niat untuk menolong Defendan, Plaintif telah memberikan Pinjaman Persahabatan kepada Defendan melalui cek-cek iaitu Bumiputra-Commerce Bank No. 095338 bertarikh 24.1.2000 untuk jumlah sebanyak RM343,186.86 dan Bumiputra-Commerce No. 095339 bertarikh 24.1.2000 untuk jumlah sebanyak RM683,625.16.

(Based on the friendship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant and with the intention of helping the Defendant, the Plaintiff granted the Frie

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top